Introduction

• No-code platforms are empowering a new wave of entrepreneurs, startups, and developers to launch products without writing a single line of code. Among the top contenders in this space are Bolt.new, and Bubble. This comprehensive comparison of Bolt.new vs Bubble explores how each tool fits different needs in the fast-growing landscape of visual development platforms and no-code app builders.

1. Performance

• Bolt.new delivers impressive performance out of the box. Thanks to its modern infrastructure and Supabase backend, pages load quickly and actions execute with minimal lag. The architecture is built with scalability and real-time responsiveness in mind, which significantly reduces the need for manual optimisation.

• Bubble, while capable of building high-performance apps, often requires additional performance tuning, especially as workflows and data models become more complex. Developers must optimise workflows and limit heavy processes to maintain speed.

2. Scalability

• Bolt.new scales seamlessly due to its use of Supabase and serverless infrastructure. As your app grows, Bolt.new can handle increased user loads and database activity with minimal effort. Its built-in tools support both horizontal and vertical scaling.

• Bubble can also scale effectively, but often requires users to reconfigure workflows and upgrade to higher-tier plans to handle additional capacity.

3. Workflow Automation

• Bolt.new simplifies workflow automation with a clean visual interface for setting up triggers and actions. You can build logic, such as onboarding flows, alerts, and integration, using visual blocks, which reduces time to production.

• Bubble supports more complex logic and backend workflows but demands a greater understanding of conditions and execution sequences.

4. Mobile Responsiveness

• Bolt.new ensures your app is responsive by default. Components adjust to different screen sizes automatically, minimising the need for manual layout tweaks.

• Bubble offers full control over mobile behaviour, but developers must manually configure responsiveness, which can be time-consuming.

5. Collaboration and Version Control

• Bolt.new supports real-time collaboration, Git-style version control, and staging environments. Multiple team members can work together simultaneously, improving productivity.

• Bubble offers multi-user access and deployment stages, but lacks real-time editing, which can slow down agile workflows.

6. Templates and Reusability

• Bolt.new encourages reusability through modular components, shared logic blocks, and visual flows. You can easily duplicate and adapt designs, which speeds up iteration.

• Bubble has many templates for app starting points, but lacks a standardised modular system.

7. Support and Community

• Bolt.new provides quick support through an active Discord community and direct team engagement. Though newer, its user base is growing, and answers are fast.

• Bubble boasts a mature community, extensive documentation, and paid expert help. However, support may be slower for free-tier users.

8. Pricing

• Bolt.new follows a transparent, usage-based model with generous free limits. It’s startup-friendly and lets you scale expenses with usage.

• Bubble uses a tiered subscription system. Key features like backend workflows and custom domains are gated behind higher plans.

9. Plugin and Marketplace Ecosystem

• Bolt.new has a growing plugin base focused on essential tools and modern integrations like Supabase and Airtable.

• Bubble has a vast plugin marketplace, supporting everything from payments to complex business logic.

10. Custom Code Support

• Bolt.new supports inline JavaScript/TypeScript blocks for advanced customisation within visual workflows. This allows developers to add precise logic without switching platforms.

• Bubble allows custom code via plugin creation, which is more complex and better suited to advanced users.

11. Use Case Fit

• Bolt.new excels at MVPs, admin dashboards, internal tools, and CRUD-based apps. Its modern stack and rapid build features make it a favourite for early-stage products.

• Bubble shines in building SaaS products, multi-user marketplaces, and apps with heavy business logic.

12. Security and Compliance

• Bolt.new inherits Supabase’s robust features like row-level security, role-based access, and end-to-end encryption.

• Bubble handles security with built-in privacy rules and permissions, but offers less backend control.

13. Internationalisation (i18n)

• Bolt.new supports i18n via manual setups or third-party integrations. There's no built-in localisation engine yet.

• Bubble provides conditional logic for multilingual support and dynamic content swapping.

14. Debugging and Testing Tools

• Bolt.new features include real-time previews, instant feedback loops, and component-level debugging. It’s optimised for modern dev workflows.

• Bubble offers a powerful but slower debugging interface. Testing can be harder in complex builds.

Final Verdict

• Choose Bolt.new if you want a fast, modern, and scalable no-code platform built for MVPs and internal tools.

• Choose Bubble if you need deep customisation, a rich plugin ecosystem, and are building feature-heavy products.

• Final Thought: When comparing Bolt.new vs Bubble, the decision depends on your app's complexity and team goals. For those evaluating no-code platform comparisons, both tools offer unique strengths. Pick the one that aligns with your vision and scale.